Tell the EPA to use common sense and leave MATS restrictions in place.

Comment
by April 17

Talking Points:
EPA Proposed Rule Change to MATS

  • U.S. power plants made up 48% of all domestic mercury emissions–before MATS was put in place. Since MATS was enacted, significant reductions in hazardous air pollutant emissions have been achieved at lower-than-projected costs.
  • Mercury is highly toxic and damages multiple organ systems, including the nervous system. Pregnant women and young children are particularly vulnerable.
  • The EPA is using the old cost-benefit analysis and out of date science to justify its proposal.
  • The proposal ensures that none of the tools of the Clean Air Act would be available for reducing hazardous air pollutants emitted by power plants

More background and important information

Take action to protect our air.